stockresearcher 19 hours ago

> “Tough place to tunnel,” [Boring Co. President] Davis said. “If we were optimizing for easiest places to tunnel, it would not be here. You have extremely hard rock, like, way harder than it should be … But it’s an engineering problem that’s fairly straightforward to solve.”

Don’t forget that you’re doing this in a river valley. But no worries, it’s just a straightforward engineering problem.

duxup 19 hours ago

So the boring company has all of one completed project (Vegas) that isn't what was promised, and a bunch of abandoned plans?

This seems like a boondoggle.

shortrounddev2 19 hours ago

I don't understand why they would dig a tunnel to make a private Tesla-only highway instead of just putting in the overstreet light rail system that they voted down in 2018. Like it seems stupidly impractical and expensive. New york has underground subways because it's a very densely packed metropolis. Why does Nashville need an underground transit system?

  • enslavedrobot 19 hours ago

    Probably because the tunnel is privately funded. Conceivably you could do both for the same money.

    • shortrounddev2 15 hours ago

      I would assume that the tunnel would be more expensive to build than a light rail system, and that the light rail system would cost less for riders. The light rail system could also have stops other than the airport (I'm not familiar with Nashville's layout). It seems to me like this tunnel is good for tourists and people with enough money to avoid public transportation, but pretty much useless for anyone who lives in Nashville

      • enslavedrobot 13 hours ago

        The city isn't paying for the tunnel, the company is.