> the company would stop investing as much in innovative search technology.
As a consumer, their current level of investment--or benefits thereof--is not easily apparent.
No, I don't need some LLM to make a nonsense explanation of what my query of keywords would mean if someone might delirious enough to use them in conversation.
Also, we must consider the flip-side: Does Google's monopolistic presence prevent and deter anybody else from making their own different investments that might create something even better?
> the company would stop investing as much in innovative search technology.
As a consumer, their current level of investment--or benefits thereof--is not easily apparent.
No, I don't need some LLM to make a nonsense explanation of what my query of keywords would mean if someone might delirious enough to use them in conversation.
Also, we must consider the flip-side: Does Google's monopolistic presence prevent and deter anybody else from making their own different investments that might create something even better?
Good.